Skip to main content

The Reserve Bank Governor, Dr. Alan Bollard should not be so predictable

The Reserve Bank Governor, Dr. Alan Bollard should not be so predictable.

Every orthodox economist and their unthinking hangers-on, the media, had the one percent OCR drop sussed weeks ago.

When it is obvious to thinking New Zealanders that the current financial meltdown has been caused by economic orthodoxy, then it should have been obvious to Bollard that orthodox solutions are bound to fail – at best a one percent drop is but another stop-gap measure.

Bollard should have announced:

‘The Reserve Bank has established a credit facility for the Finance Minister to use on behalf of the Crown. This facility is of a similar nature to that recently established to assist Trading Bank liquidity but will be accessible at the cost of administration only - less than 1% interest.

‘The Government would be able to borrow from this facility to fund or refinance any of its current borrowing requirements. Funds would also be available for any of the Government’s proposed infrastructural development projects. It is also envisaged that the Government would share this facility to satisfy Local Government infrastructural development.

‘All principal, interest, and other money that is payable in relation to money borrowed by the Crown or Local Authority is a charge on, and is payable out of, the revenues of the Crown or Local Authority.

‘In addition the Reserve Bank has decided to extend its liquidity facility to the trading banks. This increase will cover all the advances trading banks currently make available to their customers. It will be made available at the cost of administration only – less than 1% - and trading banks are able to add their margin (approx. 2.50%) on top when it is on-lent. The trading banks will be given formal directions to cease advancing any monies to their customers unless it is sourced from their Reserve Bank facility.’

The above announcement would not have been predictable. The Governor would have seen immediate evidence of a reduction in domestic cost pressures, and New Zealand’s economic activity would not be further constrained.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand

New Zealand's Central Reserve Bank is STATE owned. Despite that, instead of being used for the benefit of its owners, the people of New Zealand, successive Governments have: Allowed the foreign-owned trading banks to create and issue nearly all of the nation's money supply and claim it as their own. Notes and coins make up less than three percent of the money in circulation. Ninety seven percent of our money supply is on loan to us at interest from those banks. Actively encouraged banks to charge "rental" for this money at some of the highest interest rates in the developed world. Used high interest rates as a blunt lever to control inflation, while agreeing to exclude the resultant costs from the Price Index, so that their cost-inflationary effects do not allow pensions and awards to compensate for these. Deliberately used interest rate fluctuations to maintain an unemployed "pool" of about four percent of the workforce in order to hold down wage rates. Fa...

Show Me the “Monetary Reform” David Cunliffe!

Show Me the “Monetary Reform” David Cunliffe! Following Phil Goff’s release of Labour’s Finance Manifesto today, David Cunliffe has said in a New Zealand Labour Party press release : “Labour is backing the drive for more high value exports with monetary reform ...” I challenge David Cunliffe, Labour’s Finance Spokesperson, to front up and explain what he means by the term ‘monetary reform’. If he means replacing toxic debt-based commercial bank credit with social credit, as the sole means of money coming into existence and continuing to exist – issued in the public interest, to serve the common good - then I would endorse his definition. And if he accepts that it’s crazy for our government to borrow from foreign lenders, with interest, when we could use the publicly-owned Reserve Bank of New Zealand as an independent statutory monetary authority with the sole power to create, issue, and cancel New Zealand’s money, then I applaud his endeavours. But if Mr. Cunliffe thinks ‘mo...

Raise super age, doctors say, and spend up on kids

New Zealand Herald 8 July 2011 has the above as the lead headline on page 2. The article continues with " Generous pensions wrong while children are living in poverty, medical trio say". New Zealanders are locked into a "them or us" mentality, instead of a "If we can afford it for them, we can afford it for us as well". Logic suggests that if New Zealanders desire particular outcomes i.e. to provide super to those over 65 years and to spend up on kids health or on any other desired outcome, then the financial system should enable those outcomes to be financially possible - subject only to the availability of people with the necessary skills, technology, resources and that all projects are also environmentally sustainable.