Skip to main content

Credit Crunch sees “Money-Power” in fewer hands

Armageddon is upon us – not as we dreamed of, where the hero finally rides in, takes over the world and rules for a 1000 years of peace and plenty - but where a few anti heroes (the big banks) ride in and gobble up the smaller fry. They plead poverty and cry ‘bail us out or no more loans’. The craven Government capitulates, borrows billions of dollars at the expense of taxpayers, and relieves the bankers of their toxic loans. The Money-Power has now tightened its grasp on the world. In the short term the money taps will not flow so freely, but the rate of debt growth will escalate as the compounding effect of higher interest rates kicks in. So what are the options? How will Cullen or English manage the financial tsunami when it hits New Zealand? We know that unfettered finance capitalism of the Rogernomics and Ruthanasia variety totally failed. We can be pretty sure the Keynesian approach of governments running deficits – pumping the economy with more and more tax payer funded debt will also fail. No nation on earth has managed to create a stable industrial economy. Neither those in positions of power nor their advisors know what is wrong, and they certainly don’t know what to do. The solution is to fill the gap between incomes and prices – not with interest bearing debt – but with a dividend to all citizens. This can only come from a publicly owned money supply and a production-based – not speculative – monetary system. The 1000 years of peace and plenty could become a reality if we stood tall - established a New Zealand Monetary Authority, used it to replace the debt-infected money supply of the old economy with a transfusion of the life blood our economy needs - New Zealand dollars uninfected by compounding interest. Instead of the power of the few it would be the power of the many.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand

New Zealand's Central Reserve Bank is STATE owned. Despite that, instead of being used for the benefit of its owners, the people of New Zealand, successive Governments have: Allowed the foreign-owned trading banks to create and issue nearly all of the nation's money supply and claim it as their own. Notes and coins make up less than three percent of the money in circulation. Ninety seven percent of our money supply is on loan to us at interest from those banks. Actively encouraged banks to charge "rental" for this money at some of the highest interest rates in the developed world. Used high interest rates as a blunt lever to control inflation, while agreeing to exclude the resultant costs from the Price Index, so that their cost-inflationary effects do not allow pensions and awards to compensate for these. Deliberately used interest rate fluctuations to maintain an unemployed "pool" of about four percent of the workforce in order to hold down wage rates. Fa...

Show Me the “Monetary Reform” David Cunliffe!

Show Me the “Monetary Reform” David Cunliffe! Following Phil Goff’s release of Labour’s Finance Manifesto today, David Cunliffe has said in a New Zealand Labour Party press release : “Labour is backing the drive for more high value exports with monetary reform ...” I challenge David Cunliffe, Labour’s Finance Spokesperson, to front up and explain what he means by the term ‘monetary reform’. If he means replacing toxic debt-based commercial bank credit with social credit, as the sole means of money coming into existence and continuing to exist – issued in the public interest, to serve the common good - then I would endorse his definition. And if he accepts that it’s crazy for our government to borrow from foreign lenders, with interest, when we could use the publicly-owned Reserve Bank of New Zealand as an independent statutory monetary authority with the sole power to create, issue, and cancel New Zealand’s money, then I applaud his endeavours. But if Mr. Cunliffe thinks ‘mo...

Raise super age, doctors say, and spend up on kids

New Zealand Herald 8 July 2011 has the above as the lead headline on page 2. The article continues with " Generous pensions wrong while children are living in poverty, medical trio say". New Zealanders are locked into a "them or us" mentality, instead of a "If we can afford it for them, we can afford it for us as well". Logic suggests that if New Zealanders desire particular outcomes i.e. to provide super to those over 65 years and to spend up on kids health or on any other desired outcome, then the financial system should enable those outcomes to be financially possible - subject only to the availability of people with the necessary skills, technology, resources and that all projects are also environmentally sustainable.