Skip to main content

It’s not the “Big picture” – it’s the rotten canvas

It’s not the “Big picture” – it’s the rotten canvas Brian Gaynor (Herald, Saturday June 28) says ‘None of our political leaders seem to have a big picture vision or any idea how to reverse this long term under performance.’ I disagree - as important as the big picture is, it will never come to much if it is painted on a rotten canvas. New Zealanders have never suffered from an absence of visionary political leadership, have always had a pretty good idea of what they want as a country and have never had an economy that has been rudderless. New Zealand’s political visionaries, with their big pictures, have just been painting their dreams on the rotten canvas of debt and compounding interest. We have a desperate drive for growth, decades of current account deficits, a never ending need for taxation and rates and the unavoidable boom-bust cycles. We are unable to achieve a stabile and prosperous economy. There is the difficulty of funding a generous superannuation scheme, the impossibility of funding adequate - let alone first rate - health and education systems, the futile efforts to provide genuine growth in incomes to all, and at the same time to have a productive profitable economy that can make the investment necessary to recreate a green, sustainable New Zealand. It is all impossible because of underlying debt and interest – the rotten canvas. Nearer the end of this year, election 2008, more now than ever before we need people who can not only see the big picture but know what sort of canvas to paint it on. New Zealand’s greatest big picture, a long term success, was the massive state housing project established by the Michael Joseph Savage Labour Government. The project was built on a sound canvas of “honest money” created by the Reserve Bank of New Zealand at a mere cost of administration. Bring on the new canvas so the big picture can be realised.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand

New Zealand's Central Reserve Bank is STATE owned. Despite that, instead of being used for the benefit of its owners, the people of New Zealand, successive Governments have: Allowed the foreign-owned trading banks to create and issue nearly all of the nation's money supply and claim it as their own. Notes and coins make up less than three percent of the money in circulation. Ninety seven percent of our money supply is on loan to us at interest from those banks. Actively encouraged banks to charge "rental" for this money at some of the highest interest rates in the developed world. Used high interest rates as a blunt lever to control inflation, while agreeing to exclude the resultant costs from the Price Index, so that their cost-inflationary effects do not allow pensions and awards to compensate for these. Deliberately used interest rate fluctuations to maintain an unemployed "pool" of about four percent of the workforce in order to hold down wage rates. Fa...

Show Me the “Monetary Reform” David Cunliffe!

Show Me the “Monetary Reform” David Cunliffe! Following Phil Goff’s release of Labour’s Finance Manifesto today, David Cunliffe has said in a New Zealand Labour Party press release : “Labour is backing the drive for more high value exports with monetary reform ...” I challenge David Cunliffe, Labour’s Finance Spokesperson, to front up and explain what he means by the term ‘monetary reform’. If he means replacing toxic debt-based commercial bank credit with social credit, as the sole means of money coming into existence and continuing to exist – issued in the public interest, to serve the common good - then I would endorse his definition. And if he accepts that it’s crazy for our government to borrow from foreign lenders, with interest, when we could use the publicly-owned Reserve Bank of New Zealand as an independent statutory monetary authority with the sole power to create, issue, and cancel New Zealand’s money, then I applaud his endeavours. But if Mr. Cunliffe thinks ‘mo...

Raise super age, doctors say, and spend up on kids

New Zealand Herald 8 July 2011 has the above as the lead headline on page 2. The article continues with " Generous pensions wrong while children are living in poverty, medical trio say". New Zealanders are locked into a "them or us" mentality, instead of a "If we can afford it for them, we can afford it for us as well". Logic suggests that if New Zealanders desire particular outcomes i.e. to provide super to those over 65 years and to spend up on kids health or on any other desired outcome, then the financial system should enable those outcomes to be financially possible - subject only to the availability of people with the necessary skills, technology, resources and that all projects are also environmentally sustainable.