Skip to main content

Tax cuts - no longer a monkey on Cullen’s shoulder

Tax cuts - no longer a monkey on Cullen’s shoulder. Budget 2008 has seen the tax cut monkey effectively removed from Michael Cullen’s shoulder. The removal, though, has exposed another – the high interest rate monkey. The high interest monkey was formally placed on Dr Cullen’s shoulder, not by the National Party or any of the other opposition parties in parliament, but by Michael Cullen himself. He placed it there when he said ‘More joy likely in falling interest rates than Budget relief.’ - NZ Herald 16 May 2008.” The DSC agrees with that but warns that the high interest monkey Dr Cullen now carries will cause more grief than the tax cut issue ever did. Another quote from Michael Cullen, in the same issue of the New Zealand Herald, actually says it all: ‘If you are sitting, say, in Auckland on a $400,000 mortgage, a 2 percent drop in interest rates is $150, $160 a week or more’. Tax cuts are fine but are of a miniscule benefit to us compared to the gain a low interest rate policy would give.” Let us all hope that he continues to use his calculator wisely and works out the true cost of interest to the economy. Just as we have food labelling to expose the unhealthy ingredients we eat, we should have labelling that exposes the insidious amount of interest that is hidden in the price of every good or service we purchase or every rate or tax we pay. If the Finance Minister is sincere in his expressed wish to leave a mark on New Zealand Politics and to be remembered in an even greater way than Michael Joseph Savage, he will have to produce a Budget that will remove one more monkey from, not only his shoulder but from the shoulders of every New Zealander. The High Interest Rate Monkey must go.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand

New Zealand's Central Reserve Bank is STATE owned. Despite that, instead of being used for the benefit of its owners, the people of New Zealand, successive Governments have: Allowed the foreign-owned trading banks to create and issue nearly all of the nation's money supply and claim it as their own. Notes and coins make up less than three percent of the money in circulation. Ninety seven percent of our money supply is on loan to us at interest from those banks. Actively encouraged banks to charge "rental" for this money at some of the highest interest rates in the developed world. Used high interest rates as a blunt lever to control inflation, while agreeing to exclude the resultant costs from the Price Index, so that their cost-inflationary effects do not allow pensions and awards to compensate for these. Deliberately used interest rate fluctuations to maintain an unemployed "pool" of about four percent of the workforce in order to hold down wage rates. Fa...

Show Me the “Monetary Reform” David Cunliffe!

Show Me the “Monetary Reform” David Cunliffe! Following Phil Goff’s release of Labour’s Finance Manifesto today, David Cunliffe has said in a New Zealand Labour Party press release : “Labour is backing the drive for more high value exports with monetary reform ...” I challenge David Cunliffe, Labour’s Finance Spokesperson, to front up and explain what he means by the term ‘monetary reform’. If he means replacing toxic debt-based commercial bank credit with social credit, as the sole means of money coming into existence and continuing to exist – issued in the public interest, to serve the common good - then I would endorse his definition. And if he accepts that it’s crazy for our government to borrow from foreign lenders, with interest, when we could use the publicly-owned Reserve Bank of New Zealand as an independent statutory monetary authority with the sole power to create, issue, and cancel New Zealand’s money, then I applaud his endeavours. But if Mr. Cunliffe thinks ‘mo...

Just because you believe doesn't make it true

A relationship counsellor has an article published 12 July 2011 in one of our local Matamata newspapers. The article is great and is certainly worth a read, but his words apply to a wider sphere than just relationships. What he said was: • Just because you have been told something lots of times does not make it true. • Just because you believe something doesn’t necessarily make it true. • Just because you have believed something for a long time also does not make it true. • If you learn something based on information at the time you can unlearn it by getting more information and understanding. • Remember that whatever you believe, you will find evidence to support it, whether it is true or not. We should take heed of these words when we read and watch the media in the lead up to “Election 2011”. For instance: • Just because you hear New Zealand Superannuation is unsustainable and the age of eligibility must be raised to 67, doesn’t make it true. • Just because they say New Zealanders ...